Literature review on sex offender treatment

Does the adapted sex offender treatment programme reduce cognitive distortions? A meta-analysis

Second, case studies of men who have attended ASOTPs are explored with the aim to explain the impact the program had on them, whether and how it worked and in what contexts. There are three types of data collection. Four focus groups with altogether 24 participants look at the user experiences of treatment.

Result Filters

Juvenile sex offender program reduces recidivism. You read and agreed to our Privacy Policy. Changing the social ecologies of adolescent sexual offenders: Implications of the success of multisystemic therapy in treating serious antisocial behavior in adolescents. McConaghy, N. A review of comparison studies describes no differences between juvenile sexual offenders and non-sexual delinquents regarding sexual and physical aggression in three studies. Ho, T.

Next, eighty patient files are reviewed to examine how well the treatment worked for each person. From this a sample of 20 participants, ten for whom the treatment worked and ten for whom it did not, are followed up through interviews with offenders and practitioners, to find out in more detail why the program did not work. Third, the twelve key practitioners are revisited for expert commentary.

Support Contact

Hagan, M. The efficacy of a serious sex offenders treatment program for adolescent rapists. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 38 , — Hall, G. Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 63 5 , — Hollins, C. Social skills training with delinquents: A look at the evidence and some recommendations for practice.

  • cass county il circuit court records.
  • Research Briefs | Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative.
  • Sex Offender Treatment Project: Literature Review.

British journal of social work, 20 , — Hunter, J. The role of deviant sexual arousal in juvenile sexual offending. Criminal justice and behavior, 21 , — The utility of satiation therapy in the treatment of juvenile sexual offenders: Variations and efficacy.

  • Literature Review on Female Sex Offenders?
  • divorce during pregnancy in kansas.
  • wilkes county north carolina phone book;
  • Campbell systematic reviews.

Annals of Sex Research, 5 , 71— The use of specialized cognitive-behavioral therapies in the treatment of juvenile sexual offenders. Johnson, T. Children who molest: A treatment program.

Download Limit Exceeded

Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4 , — Kahn, T. Treatment of the adolescent sexual offender. Child and adolescent social work, 5 , — Knopp, F. Remedial intervention in adolescent sex offenses: Nine program descriptions.

Who are These Guys? Working Toward an Empirical Typology of Street-Level Pimps

Brooklyn, NY: Faculty Press. Lakey, J.

  • Files in this item.
  • abuse facility felony punishment substance texas.
  • 10 interstate drive nashville sex offender;

Myth information and bizarre beliefs of male juvenile sex offenders. Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling, 13 , 2— Lightfoot, L. The relationship between substance use and abuse and sexual offending in adolescents.

General Delinquency

McConaghy, N. Resistance to treatment of adolescent sex offenders.

Juvenile Section Research Briefs:

Sex Offender Treatment Project: Literature Review. Prepared for. Rose Munafo. Alaska Department of Corrections by the. Justice Center. Free Essay: The purpose of this literature review is to discuss the importance of sexual offender treatment, to compare and contrast research points.

Archives of sexual behavior, 18 , 97— Marshall, W. Treatment outcome with sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 11 , — Muster, N.

Sex offender treatment taking place at Phoenix resort hotel

Treating the adolescent victim-turned offender. Adolescence, 27 , — National Adolescent Perpetrator Network.

Sex offender laws, registries and policy questions: Research roundup

Home Publications. Moving Forward Making Changes: evaluation of a group-based treatment for sex offenders. Supporting files Download. Accessibility: This document may not be fully accessible.

Contents Close. Contents Choose section Acknowledgements Key findings and policy messages 1. Introduction and background 2.